Last Updated: March 2026
Best Open Source LLMs in 2026
The gap between open source and proprietary language models has narrowed dramatically. Models you can download and run yourself now compete with (and in some cases surpass) the APIs you pay for. This guide covers the best open source LLMs available right now, including how they compare, what licenses they use, and how to actually run them.
Comparison Table
| Model | Parameters | Context | License | Architecture |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Scout | 109B active | 10M tokens | Llama 4 Community License | Mixture of Experts (MoE) |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 400B active | 1M tokens | Llama 4 Community License | Mixture of Experts (MoE) |
| DeepSeek V3 | 671B total | 128K tokens | MIT | Mixture of Experts (MoE) |
| Mistral Large | 123B | 128K tokens | Apache 2.0 | Dense Transformer |
| Mistral Small | 22B | 128K tokens | Apache 2.0 | Dense Transformer |
| Qwen 2.5 | 72B | 128K tokens | Apache 2.0 (most sizes) | Dense Transformer |
| Phi-4 | 14B | 16K tokens | MIT | Dense Transformer |
| Gemma 2 | 27B | 8K tokens | Gemma Terms of Use (permissive) | Dense Transformer |
| Command R+ | 104B | 128K tokens | CC-BY-NC (non-commercial); commercial license available | Dense Transformer |
Detailed Model Reviews
Llama 4 Scout
Meta109B active (17B per expert, 16 experts) | 10M tokens context | Mixture of Experts (MoE) | Llama 4 Community License | Released: April 2025
Highlights
- +Enormous 10M token context window
- +Competitive with GPT-4o on many benchmarks
- +Efficient MoE architecture keeps inference costs low
- +Supports 12 languages natively
- +Multimodal: handles text and images
Best For
Long-context applications, multilingual tasks, and general-purpose use where you need a strong all-around model with exceptional context length.
Considerations
The Llama 4 Community License is permissive for most uses but has restrictions for very large-scale commercial deployments (700M+ monthly active users). The 10M context window requires significant memory.
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta400B active (17B per expert, 128 experts) | 1M tokens context | Mixture of Experts (MoE) | Llama 4 Community License | Released: April 2025
Highlights
- +Meta's most capable open model
- +Strong reasoning and coding performance
- +Approaches frontier proprietary model quality
- +Good for complex multi-step tasks
- +Multimodal with strong image understanding
Best For
Demanding applications where you need near-frontier performance with an open source model. Research, complex reasoning, and high-quality code generation.
Considerations
Requires significant hardware to run (multi-GPU setup). Same license restrictions as Scout. For most use cases, Scout offers a better performance-to-cost ratio.
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek671B total (37B active per token) | 128K tokens context | Mixture of Experts (MoE) | MIT | Released: December 2024
Highlights
- +Remarkably strong for its training cost
- +MIT license allows unrestricted commercial use
- +Excellent at coding and math
- +Efficient training methodology (low cost per capability)
- +Strong Chinese and English bilingual performance
Best For
Budget-conscious deployments needing strong coding and reasoning capabilities. The MIT license makes it ideal for commercial products without licensing concerns.
Considerations
The full model is very large. Performance in languages other than English and Chinese is less tested. Some users have noted occasional issues with instruction following.
Mistral Large
Mistral AI123B | 128K tokens context | Dense Transformer | Apache 2.0 | Released: January 2025
Highlights
- +Strong multilingual capabilities (especially European languages)
- +Apache 2.0 license is very permissive
- +Good balance of capability and efficiency
- +Native function calling support
- +Built-in support for structured output
Best For
European language applications and enterprise use cases where a permissive license matters. Also strong for tool-using and function-calling applications.
Considerations
Slightly behind Llama 4 and DeepSeek V3 on English-language benchmarks. Dense architecture means higher inference costs per parameter compared to MoE models.
Mistral Small
Mistral AI22B | 128K tokens context | Dense Transformer | Apache 2.0 | Released: January 2025
Highlights
- +Excellent performance for its size
- +Very efficient to run (single GPU possible)
- +Good for latency-sensitive applications
- +Strong tool use and structured output
- +Apache 2.0 license
Best For
Applications where speed and cost matter more than absolute capability. Great for tool-using agents, classification tasks, and high-throughput workloads.
Considerations
Not suitable for tasks requiring deep reasoning or extensive knowledge. Works best with clear, specific prompts.
Qwen 2.5
Alibaba Cloud72B (also 0.5B, 1.5B, 3B, 7B, 14B, 32B variants) | 128K tokens context | Dense Transformer | Apache 2.0 (most sizes) | Released: 2025
Highlights
- +Excellent range of model sizes (0.5B to 72B)
- +Strong at coding (Qwen 2.5 Coder variant is best-in-class)
- +Very good Chinese language support
- +Competitive benchmarks across all sizes
- +Active development and frequent updates
Best For
Teams that need a range of model sizes for different tasks. The Coder variant is one of the best open source models for code generation. Also excellent for Chinese language applications.
Considerations
Less battle-tested in production than Llama. The 72B model requires significant hardware. License terms vary by model size.
Phi-4
Microsoft14B | 16K tokens context | Dense Transformer | MIT | Released: December 2024
Highlights
- +Outstanding performance for its small size
- +Strong math and reasoning capabilities
- +Runs on consumer hardware (even laptops)
- +MIT license allows unrestricted use
- +Trained on high-quality synthetic data
Best For
On-device applications, edge computing, and scenarios where you need good reasoning in a small package. Excellent for math-heavy tasks and as a component in larger systems.
Considerations
Limited context window (16K). Knowledge cutoff may miss recent events. Less capable than larger models for open-ended creative tasks.
Gemma 2
Google DeepMind27B (also 2B and 9B variants) | 8K tokens context | Dense Transformer | Gemma Terms of Use (permissive) | Released: 2024
Highlights
- +Benefits from Google's research expertise
- +Very good performance-to-size ratio
- +Well-suited for fine-tuning
- +Lightweight variants run on mobile devices
- +Good for research and experimentation
Best For
Fine-tuning experiments, mobile and edge applications, and research projects. The 2B and 9B models are excellent for resource-constrained environments.
Considerations
Short context window (8K) is a significant limitation. License is permissive but not standard open source (custom Google terms). Ecosystem is smaller than Llama.
Command R+
Cohere104B | 128K tokens context | Dense Transformer | CC-BY-NC (non-commercial); commercial license available | Released: April 2024
Highlights
- +Purpose-built for RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
- +Excellent at grounding responses in provided documents
- +Strong citation and attribution capabilities
- +Good multilingual support (10+ languages)
- +Reliable tool use and function calling
Best For
RAG applications where you need the model to carefully reference and cite source documents. Enterprise search, knowledge bases, and document Q&A.
Considerations
Non-commercial license for the open weights version. Commercial use requires a license from Cohere. Slightly older than other models on this list.
How to Run LLMs Locally
Running an LLM on your own hardware gives you full control, complete privacy, zero per-request costs, and the ability to customize models to your needs. Here are the main tools for local deployment:
Ollama
The easiest way to run LLMs locally. Ollama provides a simple command-line interface that handles downloading, configuring, and running models. One command to install, one command to run. It supports Mac, Linux, and Windows, and works with most popular open source models.
# Install Ollama, then:
ollama run llama4-scout
ollama run mistral
ollama run deepseek-v3
Best for: Getting started quickly, personal use, development and testing.
Hardware needed: 8GB+ RAM for small models (7B), 16GB+ for medium (14B), 32GB+ for large (70B+).
vLLM
A high-performance inference engine designed for production serving. vLLM uses PagedAttention and other optimizations to achieve much higher throughput than naive implementations. It provides an OpenAI-compatible API, making it a drop-in replacement for proprietary APIs.
pip install vllm
vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout --tensor-parallel-size 2
Best for: Production deployments, high-throughput serving, multi-user applications.
Hardware needed: NVIDIA GPU(s) with enough VRAM for the model. A100 or H100 recommended for large models.
llama.cpp
A C/C++ inference engine that runs LLMs on CPUs (and GPUs). It is the foundation that many other tools (including Ollama) build on. llama.cpp is known for its aggressive quantization support, allowing you to run large models on surprisingly modest hardware by reducing precision from 16-bit to 4-bit or even 2-bit.
git clone https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp
cd llama.cpp && make
./llama-cli -m models/llama-4-scout-Q4_K_M.gguf -p "Hello"
Best for: Maximum hardware flexibility, running on CPUs, edge devices, and older hardware.
Hardware needed: Any modern computer. Performance scales with available RAM and CPU/GPU resources.
Hugging Face Transformers
The standard Python library for working with language models. Transformers gives you full control over model loading, inference, fine-tuning, and deployment. It is more code-heavy than the other options but offers maximum flexibility for custom workflows.
Best for: Research, fine-tuning, custom inference pipelines, and integration into Python applications.
Hardware needed: NVIDIA GPU strongly recommended. CPU inference is possible but slow for large models.
Quick recommendation: If you just want to try running a model locally, start with Ollama. It is by far the simplest option. If you need to serve a model in production, use vLLM. If you need to run on a CPU or want maximum quantization options, use llama.cpp.
How to Choose the Right Model
The best model depends entirely on your use case, hardware, and requirements. Here is a decision framework:
If you need the best overall performance
Go with Llama 4 Maverick (if you have the hardware) or Llama 4 Scout (for a better efficiency trade-off). These are the strongest open source models available. DeepSeek V3 is a close alternative with a more permissive MIT license.
If you need to run on limited hardware
Phi-4 (14B) or Mistral Small (22B) are your best bets. Both deliver impressive performance for their size and can run on consumer GPUs. For even smaller deployments, Gemma 2 (2B or 9B) or Qwen 2.5 (7B) work on laptop-grade hardware.
If you need long context
Llama 4 Scout with its 10M token context window is unmatched. For more modest (but still large) context needs, Llama 4 Maverick (1M), Mistral (128K), or Qwen 2.5 (128K) are good options.
If you need the most permissive license
DeepSeek V3 (MIT) and Mistral (Apache 2.0) have the most permissive licenses with no restrictions on commercial use. Phi-4 (MIT) is also fully unrestricted. Llama 4 is permissive for most uses but has a threshold for very large-scale deployments.
If you need strong coding capabilities
Qwen 2.5 Coder is the best dedicated coding model in open source. DeepSeek V3 is also excellent at code. For general models that are also good at coding, Llama 4 and Mistral Large both perform well.
If you need RAG and document grounding
Command R+ was specifically designed for RAG workflows and is the best at grounding responses in provided documents with accurate citations. Keep in mind the non-commercial license for the open weights.
Understanding Licenses
"Open source" means different things depending on who you ask. In the LLM world, models range from fully open (MIT/Apache) to "open weights" with restrictions. Here is a quick guide:
| License | Commercial Use | Modification | Key Restriction | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIT | Yes | Yes | None | DeepSeek V3, Phi-4 |
| Apache 2.0 | Yes | Yes | None (must include notice) | Mistral, Qwen 2.5 |
| Llama 4 Community | Yes* | Yes | 700M+ MAU requires Meta license | Llama 4 Scout, Maverick |
| Gemma Terms | Yes | Yes | Custom Google terms | Gemma 2 |
| CC-BY-NC | No* | Yes | Non-commercial only (need separate license) | Command R+ |
Always verify the current license terms on the model's official page before deploying in production. License terms can change between model versions.
Open Source vs Proprietary: When to Use Which?
Open source models are not always the right choice, and proprietary APIs are not always the wrong one. Here is a realistic assessment:
Choose Open Source When
- + Data privacy is critical (healthcare, legal, finance)
- + You need to fine-tune for a specific domain
- + High-volume usage would make API costs prohibitive
- + You need full control over the model and its behavior
- + Regulatory requirements demand on-premise deployment
- + You want to avoid vendor lock-in
Choose Proprietary APIs When
- + You need the absolute best performance
- + You do not want to manage infrastructure
- + Your usage volume is moderate
- + You need to move fast and iterate quickly
- + You want built-in safety and moderation
- + Budget for infrastructure engineers is limited
Many teams use a hybrid approach: proprietary APIs for the most demanding tasks and open source models for high-volume, lower-complexity work. For current API pricing across all providers, check our AI API Pricing Guide. You can also compare all models (both open and proprietary) on our model tracker.