LIVE
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
SONNET 4.6$3 / $15per Mtok
GPT-5.5$10 / $30per Mtok
GEMINI 3.1$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
VALS FINANCEleader Opus 4.764.4%
AFTAv1.0 whitepaper live at /whitepaper
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
SONNET 4.6$3 / $15per Mtok
GPT-5.5$10 / $30per Mtok
GEMINI 3.1$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
VALS FINANCEleader Opus 4.764.4%
AFTAv1.0 whitepaper live at /whitepaper
All systems operational0 AI providers monitored, polled every 2 minutes
Live status

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4o

Claude and ChatGPT are the two most widely used AI assistants in 2026. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7, released April 17, ships a 1 million token context window at flagship pricing and leads on code and reasoning benchmarks. OpenAI's GPT-4o counters with native multimodal including audio, a broader plugin ecosystem, and sharply lower per-token pricing. This breakdown covers pricing, performance, and use cases.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.7GPT-4o
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M$2.50/1M
Output Price$75.00/1M$10.00/1M
Context Window1M128K
Released2026-042024-05
Capabilitiestext, vision, tool-use, codetext, vision, tool-use, code

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7GPT-4oWinner
MMLU-Pro93.887.2Claude
HumanEval96.290.2Claude
GPQA Diamond76.559.1Claude
MATH93.181.3Claude
SWE-bench65.448.5Claude

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

Code generationClaude Opus 4.7

Claude scores 96.2 on HumanEval vs GPT-4o at 90.2

ReasoningClaude Opus 4.7

Claude leads on GPQA Diamond (76.5 vs 59.1) and MATH (93.1 vs 81.3)

MultimodalGPT-4o

GPT-4o supports native audio input and output; Claude is text and vision only

Context windowClaude Opus 4.7

1M tokens vs 128K tokens, nearly an 8x advantage

PricingGPT-4o

GPT-4o costs $2.50/$10 vs Claude at $15/$75 per 1M tokens

EcosystemGPT-4o

OpenAI has broader third-party integrations and plugin ecosystem

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • Complex coding tasks and large refactors
  • Advanced reasoning and research
  • Very long document processing (1M context)
  • Agentic workflows with tool use
View Claude Opus 4.7 details

Choose GPT-4o when:

  • Budget-conscious production workloads
  • Multimodal apps needing audio support
  • Broad ecosystem and plugin compatibility
  • General-purpose chat applications
View GPT-4o details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-4o?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic excels at complex coding tasks and large refactors, while GPT-4o from OpenAI is better for budget-conscious production workloads. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost compared to GPT-4o?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens. GPT-4o costs $2.50 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4o?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens, while GPT-4o supports 128K tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide