Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the model that forced everyone to take open-weight Chinese LLMs seriously. It scores within 2-3 points of Claude Opus 4.7 on most benchmarks, ships under MIT license, and prices at roughly 1/10th of Opus on the API. The tradeoff: Opus still leads on the hardest reasoning, agentic tool use, and English-language code; V4 Pro wins on cost, weight access, and self-hosting flexibility.
Head-to-Head Specs
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Input Price | $15.00/1M | $1.74/1M |
| Output Price | $75.00/1M | $3.48/1M |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Released | 2026-04 | 2026-04 |
| Capabilities | text, vision, tool-use, code | text, vision, code, reasoning |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 93.8 | 91.5 | Claude |
| HumanEval | 96.2 | 94.8 | Claude |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.5 | 73.1 | Claude |
| MATH | 93.1 | 92.4 | Claude |
| SWE-bench | 65.4 | 63.8 | Claude |
See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.
Category Breakdown
Opus 4.7 at 93.8 vs V4 Pro at 91.5. Close.
Opus 4.7 at 96.2 vs V4 Pro at 94.8
Opus 4.7 at 65.4 vs V4 Pro at 63.8
Opus 4.7 at 76.5 vs V4 Pro at 73.1
Opus 4.7 at 93.1 vs V4 Pro at 92.4. Within noise.
V4 Pro at $1.74/$3.48 vs Opus at $15/$75. ~10x cheaper input, ~20x cheaper output.
V4 Pro is MIT-licensed open weights; Opus is closed API only.
Both ship 1M token native context.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:
- ▸Maximum benchmark quality regardless of cost
- ▸Strongest agentic tool use and long-running workflows
- ▸Existing Anthropic integration and ecosystem
- ▸Closed-API trust model preferred over self-hosting
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro when:
- ▸High-volume workloads where cost dominates
- ▸Self-hosted or on-prem deployments where weights matter
- ▸Fine-tuning for specialized domains
- ▸Frontier-class quality at fraction of frontier price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic excels at maximum benchmark quality regardless of cost, while DeepSeek V4 Pro from DeepSeek is better for high-volume workloads where cost dominates. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.
How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost compared to DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74 input and $3.48 output per 1M tokens.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens, while DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1M tokens.