Skip to content
All systems operational0 AI providers monitored, polled every 2 minutes
Live status

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash landed August 13, 2026, three weeks after Gemini 3.6 Flash, and unlike that release this one moves capability as well as cost. Google says it did not retrain from scratch: 3.7 Flash is algorithmic improvements plus user feedback applied to the 3.6 line, shipped as a full replacement rather than a parallel option. Pricing is the loudest number. Introductory rates run $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output through December 31, 2026, then revert to $1.50/$7.50. At launch that was half the 3.6 Flash rate, but Google has since moved 3.6 Flash onto the same promotional schedule, so today the two cost the same on both sides of the meter and the decision is about capability alone. The coding gains Google publishes are larger than the 3.6 step was: DeepSWE v1.1 from 48.6 to 65.3 percent, FrontierCode 1.1 Main from 34.4 to 43.6, Terminal-bench 2.1 at 85.8, and GDM-MRCR v2 at 97.0 percent for 128K retrieval. Two caveats keep this honest. First, every figure here is Google-reported; Artificial Analysis has no SWE-bench Verified score for 3.7 Flash yet, and 3.6 Flash is the cautionary tale, since its Intelligence Index came back flat against 3.5 despite a strong vendor table. Second, the price is promotional. If you build a unit-economics model on $0.75/$3.75, put a January 1, 2027 reminder in it. For anything currently on 3.6 Flash, the migration case is straightforward through the end of the year: same window, same modalities, same rate, better published coding scores.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecGemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Input Price$0.75/1M$0.75/1M
Output Price$3.75/1M$3.75/1M
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Released2026-082026-07
Capabilitiestext, vision, audio, video, tool-use, code, reasoningtext, vision, audio, video, tool-use, code, reasoning

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.6 FlashWinner
SWE-bench80.879.6Gemini
MMLU-Pro90.189.3Gemini
GPQA Diamond94.593.4Gemini
OSWorld 2.047.933.8Gemini
FrontierCode v1.143.634.4Gemini

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

Price through 2026TieTie

$0.75/$3.75 on both since Google moved 3.6 Flash onto the same promotional rate; 3.7 Flash launched at half the 3.6 price

Price from January 2027TieTie

Both revert to $1.50/$7.50 on January 1, 2027

Agentic coding (DeepSWE v1.1)Gemini 3.7 Flash

Google reports 65.3 percent against 48.6, a 16.7 point step and much larger than the 3.5 to 3.6 move

Frontier coding (FrontierCode 1.1 Main)Gemini 3.7 Flash

Google reports 43.6 percent against 34.4

Long-context retrievalGemini 3.7 Flash

97.0 percent on GDM-MRCR v2 at 128K, with the same 1,048,576 token input window on both

Context window and modalitiesTieTie

Both take 1,048,576 input tokens, up to 65,536 output, and text, image, audio, video, and PDF input

Independent verificationGemini 3.6 Flash

3.6 Flash has Artificial Analysis measurements on record; 3.7 Flash has no independent SWE-bench Verified score yet

Production track recordGemini 3.6 Flash

3.6 Flash has three weeks of settled prompt behavior, which is thin but is more than zero

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash when:

  • ▸Any 3.6 Flash workload that can re-run its evals before January 2027
  • ▸Agentic coding and web development where the DeepSWE gap shows up in fewer retries
  • ▸Long-context retrieval over large document sets
  • ▸High-volume agent pipelines that want the better coding scores at no extra cost
View Gemini 3.7 Flash details

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash when:

  • ▸Pipelines with prompts and token budgets tuned tightly to 3.6 Flash verbosity
  • ▸Workloads already validated on 3.6 Flash, now that switching saves nothing on price
  • ▸Teams that will only move on independently verified benchmarks
  • ▸Evaluation harnesses mid-run that a model swap would invalidate
View Gemini 3.6 Flash details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.7 Flash from Google excels at any 3.6 flash workload that can re-run its evals before january 2027, while Gemini 3.6 Flash from Google is better for pipelines with prompts and token budgets tuned tightly to 3.6 flash verbosity. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does Gemini 3.7 Flash cost compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens, while Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1.0M tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide